I first came across the Serial podcast in October 2014 while listening to This American Life on my way to work. I found the story it tells to be enthralling, yet somehow let it fall to the wayside due to stressful nature of my work at the time. When I saw it assigned for homework I was quite happy to have a reason to dive back into it.
What were you doing at 12:30pm last Friday? Three weeks ago? Fifteen years ago? I'll be honest with you, I can hardly remember what I had for lunch today let alone specific details about where I was and who I was with. Yet in the case of the Serial Podcast, the entire story is in those kinds of details. Ultimately the Adnan Syed case, still working through the appeals process after 15 long years in the US court system, boils down to what occurred during a 21 minute window in the middle of an otherwise ordinary January afternoon. Sarah Koenig's inquiry into the case has brought new life, and more importantly new doubt, into a case that had otherwise been considered resolved for the last 15 years.
Serial is a prime example of how the inquiry process should be approached. Despite the emotionally charged nature of her investigation, Koenig is able to take a meticulously impartial approach toward the facts and materials surrounding the case. As you progress through the series you can often hear from the tone of her voice that she very much wants to prove Adnan's innocence, yet she does not allow her personal feelings on the case keep her from evidence and lines of inquiry that point to his guilt. This is ultimately what makes Serial so enthralling to the listener. Every bit of information serves to make the situation seem even more uncertain. But the inquiry process is more about discovery than merely finding an answer.
Sometimes the first answer you get isn't the correct answer. However, without critical inquiries you might never know the difference. Koenig's inquiry has certainly brought evidence to light that might have significantly altered the original outcome of the case. It has also recently led to a key witness, Asia McClain, coming forward and releasing an affidavit on January 15, 2015 that may very well decide his appeal. We will have to wait and see though.
Hey Sam, I thought your blog post was very well thought out and professional. Although I just found out about the serial podcasts I think when I have time I'll come back to them as well. I agree with the completely impartial standpoints on the inquiry proposals that could be suggested from this podcast as well.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Sam. You were one of the only people to mention Sarah's attempted impartiality (even though she admits liking Adnan). Objectivism in spite of our interests is really important when doing any kind of investigative writing.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great blog post. I totally agree with you that it is extremely tough to remember what you did a while back at a certain time. I did not think about Sarah's tone as I listened to the podcast until i read your blog post and I agree. She totally wants to prove Adna's Innocence but never shows her personal feelings to us. I also said that this would make a great inquiry project. Congrats man, great blog post and way to think about things others, including me, did not think about.
ReplyDelete